The Score – July 2025
Music is a powerful force. But behind every song lies a complex framework designed to protect the creators: copyright. The concept of music copyright has evolved over centuries, driven by technological advancements, changes in how music is listened to, and the fundamental desire to fairly compensate the artists and creators.
The Dawn of Protection
Before the printing press, music was largely disseminated through live performance and laborious hand-copying. The idea of “copyright” as we know it was nascent. Early forms of protection often came in the form of royal privileges or monopolies granted to printers, primarily to control output and generate revenue for the Crown. For instance, in 16th century England, Queen Elizabeth I granted a 21-year patent monopoly on printing polyphonic music to Thomas Tallis and William Byrd.
The real turning point for copyright in general was the Statute of Anne in 1710 in Britain. This landmark legislation was the world’s first copyright law that focused on the author’s rights, granting them exclusive control over printing and publishing their works for a limited time. While it didn’t explicitly mention music, printed musical works were often protected under its provisions.
In the United States, the first Copyright Act of 1790 followed a similar vein, initially covering “books, maps, and charts.” It wasn’t until the Copyright Act of 1831 that musical compositions were formally recognized as a separate category of copyrightable works. However, even then, the protection was largely for reproduction rights, meaning someone could print and sell sheet music, but public performances remained unprotected. This changed with the Copyright Act of 1897, which finally extended protection to public performances of musical works.
The Birth of Performance Rights
The struggle for public performance rights is often related to the following anecdote: in 1847, in Paris, three prominent composers – Ernest Bourget, Victor Parizot, and Paul Henrion – were enjoying an evening at the Café des Ambassadeurs. To their surprise and indignation, they heard some of their own compositions being performed by the café’s orchestra, without their permission and, crucially, without any payment to them.
Outraged, the composers refused to pay their bill, demanding compensation for the unauthorized use of their work. The ensuing legal battle, though initially against a different café (Café Morel), set a crucial precedent. The French courts recognized the authors’ right to control and be compensated for public performances of their musical works. This pivotal case led directly to the formation of the Société des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Éditeurs de Musique (SACEM) in 1851, the world’s first performing rights organization. This event underscored the growing need for a system to collect and distribute royalties for public performances, especially as café-concerts and other public venues gained popularity.
The Age of Recording: New Challenges
The 20th century brought revolutionary changes to music creation and distribution. The advent of phonographs, radio, and later, film, brought new complexities. The Copyright Act of 1909 was a significant update, introducing the concept of a “compulsory mechanical license.” This allowed for the reproduction of musical works on records without direct permission from the copyright holder, provided a statutory royalty fee was paid. This was a pragmatic response to the burgeoning recording industry.
However, a major gap remained: sound recordings themselves were not federally protected until the Sound Recording Act of 1971. Before this, the copyright only applied to the underlying musical composition (the melody and lyrics), not the specific performance captured on a record. This meant that while a composer was protected, the recording artist and record label had fewer federal safeguards.
The Copyright Act of 1976 became the foundation of modern copyright law, significantly extending protection to “life of the author plus 50 years” (now 70 years in many jurisdictions) and introducing the crucial concept of “fair use,” allowing limited use of copyrighted material for purposes like criticism, comment, and education. It also broadened the scope of protectable works to include anything “fixed in any tangible medium of expression.”
The digital age, with its ease of copying and global dissemination, brought about a new wave of challenges. Acts like the Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings Act of 1995 (DPRSRA) and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA) aimed to address digital transmissions and online piracy, providing tools for copyright holders to protect their works in the new landscape. Most recently, the Music Modernization Act (MMA) in the US (2018) sought to update copyright law for the streaming era, particularly by creating the Mechanical Licensing Collective (MLC) to streamline royalty collection for digital uses.
The Core Reason for Being
Why do we have music copyright at all? The fundamental reasons are rooted in encouraging creativity and ensuring fair compensation for creators:
- Incentivizing Creation: Copyright grants creators exclusive rights to their work for a limited time. This exclusivity provides an incentive to invest time, effort, and resources into producing new music, knowing they can control its use and profit from its success. Without this protection, there would be little economic motivation for artists to create.
- Fair Compensation: Music is a livelihood for many. Copyright ensures that songwriters, composers, performers, and producers are compensated for their work when it is used, whether through sales, streams, broadcasts, or public performances. This allows them to continue their craft and sustain themselves.
- Control and Integrity: Copyright gives creators the power to decide how their music is used. This includes preventing unauthorized alterations, misrepresentations, or uses that go against their artistic vision. It protects the integrity of their work.
- Public Domain and Cultural Enrichment: While protecting creators, copyright also ensures that works eventually enter the public domain. This means that after a specified period, the music becomes freely available for anyone to use, build upon, and adapt, enriching the cultural landscape for future generations. It strikes a balance between private incentive and public benefit.
At Music360, we believe that fair compensation and equitable distribution of royalties are pivotal in sustaining a vibrant music ecosystem and preserving cultural heritage. By accurately recognizing the value that music brings to venues, we aim to create a more just and transparent music economy.
Music360 